Curse

Lady Raenef · Dec 21, 2007, 10:24 AM // 10:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prof Of Black

reward points gg.

~Prof.

You can't get those things with reward points.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix Tears

like that for gladiator should count each win in a PvP match for 1 Point,,there should gewt removed then this senseless 5 win row requirement for 1 point...but also then the raising of points....each win gives then 1 point..regardless of how long your win streak is...
When they change this..then they can change imo also the HoM requirement and let the glad title only be shown..when the title got maxed before
and as said..u get then ever 1 point for a win in any pvp match...

Damn, I'm tired of people like you who complained about the Gladiator title. I LOVED it when it was TEN, count it, 10 wins in a row to get ONE point. Now we have all this stupid nonsense about 5 wins. At least they raised my Gladiator points to make it fair, I have rank 3 now. I have it in the HoM for all my characters. Now you want them to dumb it down FURTHER?

400 wins in the RA? That's easier than saying Gladiator point. Jesus Christ, quit being so lazy. If they made it 1 point, instead of what is it, 25 points for Rank 1, it would be increased to 250. 4,000 for Rank 3. Yeah, I may have gotten 4,000 already but still, to hell with that. Your idea FAILS.

fir · Dec 21, 2007, 10:28 AM // 10:28

/signed for r9/10
reason Pe title maxing isnt that hard and when evry one can easy reach r6 and then the hero title for gw 2 is a bit ruined so r/8/10 is my oppinion :P

Div · Dec 21, 2007, 12:08 PM // 12:08

Who cares. If you want to collect it all, go play Pokemon, or man up and explore areas of the game that you haven't yet. Sitting here complaining about how hard certain PvP titles are to get for your HoM won't get you anywhere.

Getting to rank 6 and being unable to display it is the same as getting to 30/34 elona zones vanquished and being a bit short on displaying that in HoM. Cry more please.

And to whoever thinks high end PvPers don't PvE, you guys are idiots. That is all.

Faer · Dec 21, 2007, 12:42 PM // 12:42

No PvP v. PvE arguments, please. I understand where you are all coming from (believe me, I do), but nobody really wants to deal with that drama here. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, no matter how retarded you might believe those opinions to be. We could go on and on discussing why X is fair and why Y is not, or how many hours Player Type A puts into Game Type B, but all that would do is serve to derail the discussion and cause back and forth bickering for the next twenty years. So please, just discuss whether or not you feel that the suggestion presented is a good one, and keep all that extra out of it. Any derailment nonsense from here on will be deleted, and users will be noted for it.

TL;DR version: shut up and let me sleep. If you wake me up, I will DESTROY you.

Fried Tech · Dec 21, 2007, 01:09 PM // 13:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by HawkofStorms

I'll ask again. Why the heck should R8 be required for the HoM, when you can put Protector of X/Legendary Sunspear into the HoM, which takes a fraction of the time and requires much less skill.

Why should it be rank 3 when i have to cap 350 skills for skill hunter, or explore 100% of all campaigns for legendary cart, or vanquisher, or guardian.

There is no balance to the HoM.
You get monuments for easy stuff( LB) to very hard stuff (hero, vanq)

/notsigned because we still have atleast a year till gw2. work on the titles you want instead of asking for them to be rediculously easy to get and then complaining to anet that "there isnt any new content im bored"

The Legg · Dec 21, 2007, 03:47 PM // 15:47

the monument should change depending on your rank, wolf for r8, tiger for r9-11, pheonix for r12-r14 etc

clarke · Dec 21, 2007, 04:00 PM // 16:00

This post is quite ridiculous, you can get loads of fame from 1 victory because of consecutives, comander and champion get you 1 point a go... and gladiator is now changed to reward consecutives , thats why theres a difference in rank requirement. if they had r3 hero , that would just be stupid and embarassing.

/signed for r9 monument, and a better statue instead of a map

Snow Bunny · Dec 21, 2007, 06:10 PM // 18:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prof Of Black

reward points gg.

~Prof.

ORLY?

God the ignorance of people here just flabbergasts me.

maraxusofk · Dec 21, 2007, 09:08 PM // 21:08

yeah i think r8 is stupid. it should be r9+ but i think a solution to satisfy everyone would be to have higher rank rewards for ppl with higher rank. someone wit r12 should NOT have the same reward as someone wit r8 imo.

thedeadlyassassin · Dec 21, 2007, 10:07 PM // 22:07

/notsigned.

EotN was a PvE expansion. Find me 3 things in the expansion that helped PvP? I can name only 1 right now, new heros, which also help PvE a lot.

I honestly, seriously, do not care what you add in your hall, but for the reason I gave, I said not signed

moko · Dec 21, 2007, 10:41 PM // 22:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prof Of Black

reward points gg.

~Prof.

posting when you have no clue gg.

earn your titles, cry less, if anything, raise the requirement, should be r9.

same for commander and glad tho. commander 4, glad 5-6 imo.

ONOS U BAED ELITIST MY HOM MONUMENT QQ

Likelytodie · Dec 21, 2007, 11:00 PM // 23:00

/signed for raising the rank req for hero monument

Why would they choose r8 in the first place? I have no idea.